The pink box is only intended to give the person at the front of the room some indication of where they should, in general, stand in order to be within range of the Meetecho cameras. I agree that at IETF 93 the box ended up so small that it feels confining. At any rate, if it’s prohibiting interactive discussions or productive thinking, it’s clearly not working. Meetecho has confirmed that it’s a simple matter for them to pan out and provide a larger view of the room. For IETF 94 we will map out a significantly larger area on the floor. We will also make it clear that if you wander outside the boundaries of the pink box, it will not result in any punitive action (despite what we may have implied by the photo Jari showed during the plenary). Alexa On Jul 24, 2015, at 3:23 AM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I understand the motivation. > I strongly support facilitating remote attendance at meetings. > I think that presentations at WG meetings are to be discouraged in the majority > of cases. > I cannot, personally, achieve an interactive discussion while my feet are nailed > to the floor. I need to be able to move, to point to things, to interact with > others in the room. > > Perhaps this is just my problem. I should get over it, train myself out of it, > or get someone else to lead the discussions. > Otherwise, I will end up presenting. > > A proposal... > Could Meetecho please just zoom out. > > Alternative proposal... > Make the pink box a guide for speakers who want to be in frame, but stop telling > us that we MUST stand in the box. > > Thanks, > Adrian > > ---------- Alexa Morris / Executive Director / IETF 48377 Fremont Blvd., Suite 117, Fremont, CA 94538 Phone: +1.510.492.4089 / Fax: +1.510.492.4001 Email: amorris@xxxxxxxx Managed by Association Management Solutions (AMS) Forum Management, Meeting and Event Planning www.amsl.com <http://www.amsl.com/>