I have no particular objection to the concept here, but I do have a question about one sentence in the draft. Section 1 states: > Like Top-Level Domain Names, .onion addresses can have an arbitrary > number of subdomain components. This information is not meaningful > to the Tor protocol, but can be used in application protocols like > HTTP [RFC7230]. > I honestly don't understand what is being stated here, or why a claim is made about HTTP at all in this document. Are we talking about the common practice of www.example.com == example.com? And what significance does that last phrase have to the document? Eliot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature