+1 on support On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Tom Ritter <tom@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 16 July 2015 at 00:44, Joe Hildebrand <hildjj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I don't see any mention of the CAB Forum stuff in the draft. Has anyone >> done the analysis to see if CAB Forum members really will issue certs to >> .onion addresses if we do this? Do they issue certs for .example or .local >> today? > > Not only will they issue certificates .onion, but they will not be > required to revoke the certificates they have _already_ issued, and > are using happily. I know Facebook and Blockchain, a few certs for > each, and maybe a third I'm forgetting. That will only go up over > time. > > On the topics of metrics, indeed https://metrics.torproject.org/ is > the place. You missed a zero though. It's 2 *million* directly > connecting users/day on average, not 200K. > > On the topic of carrot, I would suggest .carrot.alt =) I would also > ask about your user base. > > On the topic of TLD vs Special Use: Yes I can confirm we want a > special use name, not a TLD. > > On the topic of reliable resource, > https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/ is a great URL, this > is where we standardize our specifications and update them. Our > process is different from the IETF, but there is one. rend-spec.txt > in particular deals with .onion - but you would need to work with the > rest of the specs to get that far. Barring operator accidents or some > absurd explosion in DNS price, I expect torproject.org will live 40+ > years reliably. It may not be as future-reliable as iana.org or > ietf.org, but that URL, and/or "the torspec repository" is probably as > reasonably reliable as any other offsite link. > > I support this draft. > > -tom > -- Joseph Lorenzo Hall Chief Technologist Center for Democracy & Technology 1634 I ST NW STE 1100 Washington DC 20006-4011 (p) 202-407-8825 (f) 202-637-0968 joe@xxxxxxx PGP: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10 1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871