On 4/24/15 11:12 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Things have obviously changed. We have gotten the name or names on the > > first page tied up with questions of attribution, IPR issues, the > > entirely different conventions of more academic/scholarly and formal > > publications and carryover of assumptions from other communities more > > broadly, and with compensation and performance review polices in a > > number of companies. I'd like to go back; I don't see how. > > If we can come up with a way of providing attribution in a way that Tenure > Committees understand, then I don't care what goes on page 1. > > (And if Tenure Committees understand, then I think that will likely solve > the problems of other communities.) insofar as I am aware tenure committies have never looked at standardization activities with much favor and I don't think anything here will change that. > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature