John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Things have obviously changed. We have gotten the name or names on the > first page tied up with questions of attribution, IPR issues, the > entirely different conventions of more academic/scholarly and formal > publications and carryover of assumptions from other communities more > broadly, and with compensation and performance review polices in a > number of companies. I'd like to go back; I don't see how. If we can come up with a way of providing attribution in a way that Tenure Committees understand, then I don't care what goes on page 1. (And if Tenure Committees understand, then I think that will likely solve the problems of other communities.) -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature