Randy, > On Apr 2, 2015, at 6:18 PM, Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> It more than expanding the acronyms. In this case expanding the >> acronyms wouldn’t solve the problem ... >> >> We could do a lot better here. > > the problem is that these are not written with the general ietf audience > in mind, meaning folk from optical to apps [0]. they are written for folk > already familiar with the subject. I agree. If these notices are sent to the IETF list, they should be written to be understandable to the general IETF audience. Otherwise, what is the point of sending them to the IETF list. Bob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail