> On Mar 30, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Richard Shockey <richard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The CU folks told us that this is the NUMBER 1 issue their members > complain about. Yes it is our problem because we define SIP. I spoke with one of them in the lobby Saturday morning. I explained how what she was calling for was a global (federated?) PKI, and she wasn’t likely to achieve her goal without one. That it wasn’t a protocol problem, as we have the protocols and protocol support for it. All it takes is money. Hmmm.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail