Hi. I will note that many people have expressed concerns about whether the current document is fair from the point of view of a potential respondent.. That is another part of building a safe IETF. If we're afraid of process and don't have confidence that we'll be treated fairly when people disagree with us, it can make it hard to participate in comfort. I think considering small changes that improve peoples's confidence in the fairness of the process could be very valuable in helping listen to these concerns. The basic principle Nico seems to be going for here is that you get a chance to respond before a remedy is imposed. I agree that providing some mechanism for temporary removal may be important. I understand the desire to avoid being overly proscriptive. However lots of folks have been expressing some unease in this area, and Nico has outlined a simple and hopefully uncontraversial principle. I think codifying that is valuable.