I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb

[Michael StJohns <mstjohns@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Version -06 of draft-farresnickel-harassment has this small phrase that
was added in this version:


>   
> Any definition of
> harassment prohibited by an applicable law can be
>    subject to this set of
> procedures.

I find "prohibited by an applicable law" to be somewhat
problematic and overreaching.

This should be removed.  If something is a violation of applicable
law, then the folks responsible for that law should deal with it, not
us.  We should be dealing with harassment that impinges on the IETFs
creation of standards and not with harassment that has little or no nexus
with the IETF.  

Mike