> Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote : > Going to court to dispute the particular authority under which the FCC has proposed regulations when they obviously have authority that > you are going to find far more onerous is a strategy that is more to the interests of the lawyers and lobbyists than their clients. > Their new 'product' they are offering being to help relieve their client of a few more tens of millions for litigation, lobbying and > spurious 'research' fighting the title II regulations. Precisely. New source of revenue, each side gets a piece of the pie. > The only mystery here is why the administration chose Internet regulation to be the topic on which they insisted a stand be taken > rather than one of the other dozens of issues where it is rather easier to understand what the regulations should be. Mmm, the political gain does not look too bad to me, what would you have picked instead ? > Getting a different set of lobbyists and sacking the faux researchers would be a good start. What makes you think their replacements would be better ? Michel.