Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/03/2015 09:36, Nico Williams wrote:
> Have there been harassment cases in the IETF, using the definition
> given in the I-D?

We'll never know, because there was no procedure in place to handle them.
I have certainly heard anonymous stories of unpleasant behaviour.

On 10/03/2015 09:42, Michael StJohns wrote:
> It would be useful to distribute that written assessment from the 
> insurance and liability folks to the list or at least publish it.

In general I am all for such transparency. But actually, I don't
think it would serve the IETF well in this case to publish the
analysis of hypothetical litigation - it would simply feed free
legal advice to hypothetical litigators.

    Brian





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]