Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Pete,

On 3/4/15 11:25 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
> [Explicitly Cc'ing folks who participated in the thread.]
>
> On 2/27/15 10:24 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>> I'm going to ask Patrik to publish a revised ID at this point, which
>> I expect to see in the next couple of days.
>
> The new version of the document (-12) is out, announcement attached.
> It is now Informational, it removes the discussion of flag "D" for
> NAPTR, and adds a bit of discussion to security considerations. I
> would appreciate folks giving it a sniff and making sure it addresses
> your earlier concerns. If so, I'll go ahead and ballot it for the
> 12-March IESG telechat.

I just wanted to say that I think it's a bad idea to make this thing
informational.  The fact is that URI has been kicking around for years
upon years, and what we are doing now is documenting existing practice. 
PS is a perfectly fine instrument to gain experience, warts and all,
with URI.

Eliot


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]