Re: [IAB] last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



wait… is RFC 2870bis for TLDS or the roots?  (I’ll note that conflation of roots and tlds was part of the problem with RFC 2870…)

/bill
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.8102

On 5March2015Thursday, at 15:57, Mark Andrews <marka@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> In message <20150305232806.GG1197@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Sullivan writes:
>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 08:48:27AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>> required.  Yes, there are servers that do DNSSEC but don't correctly
>>> handle DO (it is not echoed in the response).  The current root
>>> servers are do not exibit this mis-behaviour.  This however comes
>>> from requiring DNSSEC support not EDNS support.
>> 
>> I would like to understand exactly what you mean by, "Do DNSSEC but
>> don't correctly handle DO."  That sounds to me like the kind of do
>> DNSSEC, not that they do it properly.  DNSSEC requires EDNS0, full
>> stop; therefore any additional text on the matter is unnecessary.
> 
> To get the DNSSEC records added the the responses the server needs
> to be able to see the DO=1 bit.  It does not need to properly handle
> unknown EDNS options.  It does not need to properly handle unknown
> flags.  It does not need to properly handle EDNS version != 0.  It
> does not need fully handle DO by adding DO=1 to the response.
> 
> I'm sure all the TLD operators listed in tld-report.html [1] with
> broken implementations think they are doing EDNS correctly.
> 
> [1] http://users.isc.org/~marka/tld-report.html
> 
> When only 65% of the world gets EDNS support right I don't think it
> unreasonable to make fully compliant EDNS support a requirement.
> 
>> Moreover, see upthread the exchange between Bill Manning and John
>> Klensin.  I think if we have a root server operator that starts
>> running some dodgy implementation of some name server code, the root
>> server operators are going to have a worse day of it than the IETF.  I
>> think we should specify exactly what we need and no more.  Since
>> DNSSEC entails EDNS0 support, we're done.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> A
>> 
>> -- 
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> -- 
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@xxxxxxx
> 






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]