> If there are docs that specify what a host should do with such > "malchecksummed" packets, I'm happy to put a pointer in there. If not, > I'd rather avoid discussing it in this draft. That may be the best approach. That is, not start specifying protocol in this document, unless it is just a reference. FWIW, I re-read 1035 and 2181 and 768 quickly, and did not see such a statement. But I could have missed it. Or it may have been considered to be obvious :-) Jari
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail