Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10

To: Hervé Ruellan <herve.ruellan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:35:27 +0200
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx, "General Area Review Team \(gen-art@xxxxxxxx\)" <gen-art@xxxxxxxx>, "fenix@xxxxxxxxxx" <fenix@xxxxxxxxxx>, "ietf-http-wg@xxxxxx" <ietf-http-wg@xxxxxx>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@xxxxxxxxx>, David Black <david.black@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <54C267DE.5040202@crf.canon.fr>

> I made a proposal at https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/704

Looked reasonable to me.

jari

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: Stephen Farrell

References:
- Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: Black, David
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: Martin Thomson
- RE: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: RUELLAN Herve
- RE: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: Black, David
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: Hervé Ruellan
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: Martin Thomson
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: Hervé Ruellan