Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10

To: Hervé Ruellan <herve.ruellan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 01:17:45 +0200
Cc: "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, "Black, David" <david.black@xxxxxxx>, "fenix@xxxxxxxxxx" <fenix@xxxxxxxxxx>, "ietf-http-wg@xxxxxx" <ietf-http-wg@xxxxxx>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@xxxxxxxxx>, "General Area Review Team \(gen-art@xxxxxxxx\)" <gen-art@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <54C13996.2030906@crf.canon.fr>

Thanks for the response. I think this may slightly enhance the feeling that the list may not be needed.

Jari

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: Martin Thomson

References:
- Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: Black, David
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: Martin Thomson
- RE: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: RUELLAN Herve
- RE: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: Black, David
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
  - From: Hervé Ruellan