At 10:59 AM 1/10/2015, Michael Richardson wrote: >That's why I wrote "contribution" --- we could imagine some system of points, >with the datatracker being the scoreboard, but I'm not clear that we need an >particularly complex system or overly restrictive system. But we do need - my strongly held opinion - an "objective" one and that's harder to craft with respect to the definition of "contribution". Whereas simply counting meetings is objective and repeatable. To be honest, I foresee a spate of throw away IDs being crafted to be counted as contributions and that might not be all that useful for our process. Later, Mike