Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 8 January 2015 at 10:56, Greg Wilkins <gregw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
​ [heaps, which I will snip].

I agree pretty well with what Greg's written, and just want to add one incidental outcome that may be considered a positive: by defining a mechanism to allow HTTP/2 traffic to flow over the existing web, using existing HTTP/1 ports (even if most browsers will only use HTTPS ports), we've at least paved a way to allow other/future protocols to do the same.

I agree with James Snell's earlier sentiment as well, that HTTP/2 should aim for Experimental, rather than Standards track. We've bought the upgrade path (sorry, the ALPN-based TLS-as-an-opaque-tunnel path), so now we're able to experiment with new/improved web protocols, and this is the first such experiment.

Cheers
--
  Matthew Kerwin
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]