joel jaeggli <joelja@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I support a two year term for the extra Routing AD - that's a good
>> amount of time for getting good at the AD job, whereas one year is too
>> short, and three is (as others said) a lot of commitment, as well as
>> being a problem if the person loses interest or some such issue.
> 3 years means a second term is a total of six, I can say with some
> certainty that six year is a lot time to commit to being an AD.
I was not originally suggesting that the terms for the RTG ADs be 3 years,
although that solves the problem of having two RTG ADs up some years.
I was suggesting that the *initial* term for the 3rd AD be 3 years.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature