RE: term for 3rd RTG AD

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Speaking as someone who will not be on the IESG if/when this happens.

 

- I don't understand a significant reason against 2 years (yes, it puts it in synch with the chair appointment, but so what?)

- I think 3 years is a long ask as Murray points out

- I do not know whether the need for the third AD will last three years

- I worry that 1 year would be too short especially if NomCom are not able to process in time for March

- I worry that the overhead of being nominated would make 1 year too small a reward

 

So, what was wrong with 2 years?

 

Adrian

 

From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy
Sent: 07 January 2015 17:28
To: Michael Richardson
Cc: ietf
Subject: Re: term for 3rd RTG AD

 

On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

My personal preference, btw, is to put someone in place for 3 years.

 

 

I prefer a one year term, given that it seems a higher bar for employer support to ask for three years versus one for a potential first term.

-MSK