Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Nov 16, 2014, at 11:10 PM, John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>> Here's a concrete suggestion: the Bing search engine and IE browser
>>> support this safe flag right now.  Could you talk to the people
>>> responsible for them and ask whether they considered more fine grained
>>> schemes such as PICS, and why they implemented a single bit instead?
>> 
>> Or, I can go to their website and see that their “bit" implements ternary logic:
> 
> Bing implements the exact proposal in this I-D.  (The I-D says so.)
> 
> If you believe otherwise, please provide references.

Reference?  Just see the screenshot of the Bing preferences page:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/attach/ietf/pngkwLXzM.png

So a single bit value might get you to the “moderate” or “strict” settings, even if your profile says that you would like “off”, but that’s not what they want. If they wanted a strictly on/off switch, they would implement it in their profiles, just as Google did.

Yoav






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]