Adrian Farrel > AB >> 2- The draft mentions in the introduction:- This modification is >> strictly optional, > > >> [AB] the reviewer suggests to include in the ID-Abstract that this >> standard is optional. It is not enough to only mention in the >> introduction such important information. > Good point. The abstract does actually say "to permit", which indicates this is not mandatory. But we can add the word optional to that. Regarding the title, there's a usual tradeoff between brevity (and it's already not brief) and detail. I wouldn't add the suggests "based on link quality" as that really adds nothing useful (it's not an optimisation based on link quality, it's an optimisation to remove a side-effect of the use of link quality). To be a useful lengthening of the title, it would, I think, have to mention something about the two hop neighbourhood. I haven't consulted with my co-author, but my proposal would be to see if anyone on the IESG has a problem with the title as-is. -- Christopher Dearlove Senior Principal Engineer, Information Assurance Group Communications, Networks and Image Analysis Capability BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK Tel: +44 1245 242194 | Fax: +44 1245 242124 chris.dearlove@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx | http://www.baesystems.com BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687 ******************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. ********************************************************************