This is probably my fault. I didn't think it was wise to submit a
new version of the I-D until all of the comments & corrections had
been collected. I didn't want folks trying to review a moving target,
especially since a change in paragraph A might affect the interpretation
of paragraph B.
----------------+--------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. Igoe | "We can't solve problems by using the same kind
kmigoe@xxxxxxx | of thinking we used when we created them."
| - Albert Einstein -
----------------+--------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 5:20 AM
To: Ben Campbell; Igoe, Kevin M.
Cc: gen-art@xxxxxxxx Team (gen-art@xxxxxxxx); draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm.all@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm-14
I am looking at this draft in order to fill in my recommendations for tonight's IESG telechat.
Ben, thank you for your review which pointed out worries (and I agreed with those), and thank you Kevin for the responses (which made sense to me).
However, in addition to the major/minor issue discussion, there were several suggested edits. Is there a plan to add them to a new version? I don't see a new draft version available yet... didn't see anything that is critical, but I also didn't want to us to lose discussed improvements.
Jari