>No. I mean that a badly motivated web site can pretend to offer safe material >using this but actually offer objectionable material (for whatever definition >of safe or objectionable you care to adopt). For example a site being used >to "groom" innocent victims could pretend that all its content was safe. >This would actually make the site much more dangerous than before, because >of the illusion of safety. How does this differ from the current situtation? Any site can show logos that say "100% family friendly", and have a safe mode flag you can toggle in your browser. R's, John