Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: IETF <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:51:06 +1100
Archived-at: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/AEMFsjZbMiWDzHmGPFEcqPoKECY
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Donald Eastlake said:

> I believe it has many of the problems discussed in RFC 3675.

Could you please be more specific? The analogy is not obvious, and that's a big RFC.

Thanks,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Donald Eastlake

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]