Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document:  draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-08

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2014–10-23

IETF LC End Date: 2014–10-30

IESG Telechat date:

 

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a BCP RFC.

 

 

Major issues:

 

Minor issues:

 

Section 2.3 discusses the issue of defining appropriate registration policy. I was wondering about consistency between the policies of similar registries, is it important and how to verify it. For example the policy for http://www.iana.org/assignments/sdp-security-descriptions/sdp-security-descriptions.xhtml#sdp-security-descriptions-3 is standard action and for http://www.iana.org/assignments/srtp-protection/srtp-protection.xhtml#srtp-protection-1 is specification required. I think that such cases should be discussed when defining the registration policy. 

 

Nits/editorial comments:

In section 2.3 “judgement” should be “judgment”

 


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]