Hi, > On 22 Oct 2014, at 22:10, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider > the following document: > - 'URN Namespace for NATO' > <draft-murdock-nato-nid-02.txt> as Informational RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2014-11-19. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. This document looks fine and I support its publication. But if I am to nit pick, I think it should be changed to use ABNF or at least state which BNF form it is using to describe syntax. > Abstract > > > This document describes a Uniform Resource Name (URN) namespace for > assignment by NATO. The current primary use is for uniquely > identifying Extensible Markup Language (XML) artifacts that provide > information about NATO message text formats and service > specifications as described in various NATO standards [4], > instructions and publications. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-murdock-nato-nid/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-murdock-nato-nid/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > >