Re: email standards

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In case it is not clear, I believe that my recent note and
Dave's (partially quoted below) represent complete agreement.
That might be notable because this is one of the spaces in which
we often disagree.

    john


--On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 13:27 -0700 Dave Crocker
<dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 9/23/2014 1:08 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>> I meant two secure email standards. Empirically we have two
>> right now, S/MIME and PGP.
>> 
>> Since I was talking about security, I thought it was obvious
>> from the context.
> 
> 
> It wasn't.
> 
> And to be thorough, you also forgot PEM...
> 
> 
> Anyhow, sometimes we need to let competitive efforts develop
> and then let the market choose among them.  Artificially
> stifling serious constituenies from pursuing credible
> alternatives is often poor engineering and worse politics.
>...
> FWIW, it's unlikely that the competition in this case has had
> anything to do with the poor uptake of either mechanism.








[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]