Re: Substantial nomcom procedure updates (Was: Re: Consolidating BCP 10 (Operation of the NomCom))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/16/14 1:46 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> Or perhaps the question to ask is what specific problems, dangers,
> benefits, etc., do folk consider worth working to prevent or ensure?

That's what I've been wondering, as well.  It sounds like some
nomcom chairs have identified some ambiguities that could use
clarification and some minor policy tweaks (well, I would put
the reduction in the number of nomcom members per company in
the "minor" category; others might not), but I haven't seen
anyone propose a major overhaul.  Is there something that's
likely to be controversial?

Melinda






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]