Re: Substantial nomcom procedure updates (Was: Re: Consolidating BCP 10 (Operation of the NomCom))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: dcrocker@xxxxxxxx, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Substantial nomcom procedure updates (Was: Re: Consolidating BCP 10 (Operation of the NomCom))
From: Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:36:02 -0400
Archived-at: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/swCeP0_Gl_Oa95EOZfRxnhT_KR0
Cc: ietf <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <54175E31.3000002@dcrocker.net>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0

I like Dave's suggestion i.e., reduce the per-company NOMcom appointment
limit to 1 from 2.

It's not a perfect solution, but it's clear, simple to implement, and
the intent is obvious.

Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Substantial nomcom procedure updates (Was: Re: Consolidating BCP 10 (Operation of the NomCom))
  - From: Michael StJohns
- Re: Substantial nomcom procedure updates (Was: Re: Consolidating BCP 10 (Operation of the NomCom))
  - From: Allison Mankin
- Re: Substantial nomcom procedure updates (Was: Re: Consolidating BCP 10 (Operation of the NomCom))
  - From: Bert Wijnen (IETF)

References:
- Consolidating BCP 10 (Operation of the NomCom)
  - From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Consolidating BCP 10 (Operation of the NomCom)
  - From: Michael StJohns
- Substantial nomcom procedure updates (Was: Re: Consolidating BCP 10 (Operation of the NomCom))
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: Substantial nomcom procedure updates (Was: Re: Consolidating BCP 10 (Operation of the NomCom))
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Substantial nomcom procedure updates (Was: Re: Consolidating BCP 10 (Operation of the NomCom))
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Re: Substantial nomcom procedure updates (Was: Re: Consolidating BCP 10 (Operation of the NomCom))
Next by Date: Re: Substantial nomcom procedure updates (Was: Re: Consolidating BCP 10 (Operation of the NomCom))
Previous by thread: Re: Substantial nomcom procedure updates (Was: Re: Consolidating BCP 10 (Operation of the NomCom))
Next by thread: Re: Substantial nomcom procedure updates (Was: Re: Consolidating BCP 10 (Operation of the NomCom))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]