Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Nico Williams <nico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:35:19PM +0000, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:
> > The big change with DMARC is a deprecation of the Sender/From
> > differentiation, effectively requiring that these two will be the same. It
> > seems that big systems have voted that the differentiation causes more
> > harm (spam, phish) than good (remailers).

That's curious.  Maybe I'm not understanding, but:

DMARC doesn't check Sender, so I don't see how this is relevant.  Or do you mean that what one would now put in Sender is required to be in From?

The cases in which only the LHS differs are rather uninteresting though;
Christian H. is quite right.  We've taken a step backwards.

Maybe in some ways that's true.  On the other hand, if almost nothing ever checked Sender to begin with, and a lot of things that "should" have generated it didn't, what practical difference does it make?

-MSK

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]