On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 9/11/2014 10:34 PM, Christian Huitema wrote: >> ... >... > > >> At that point, the issue is mostly with the UI. If my reader did >> recognize the "simple forwarding" case from "authorized remailers," >> then the message wrapping solution would be just fine. The good thing >> is that it is very much under my control. > > This suggests defining a wrapping convention that is sufficiently > distinction so that receiving software can know it is this specific type > of wrapping and can choose to unwrap the message, without doing > unwrapping for other kinds of encapsulated mail. content type message/re-mailed or something? Thanks, Donald ============================= Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx > d/ > > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net