Re: draft discussion lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:07:28AM +0000, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> The place I primarily see not-wg-names is irtf drafts
> (draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis), IAB drafts (draft-iab-doi), drafts
> from old working groups or non-wg lists
> (draft-tsou-behave-natx4-log-reduction), drafts whose authors haven’t
> decided what working group they target (draft-welzl-ecn-benefits,
> which could be in aqm or tsvwg) or are building towards what someone
> hopes will be such a group, and some where someone fat-fingered the
> name of a working group. There are at least some where someone is
> simply bringing up a topic (draft-wierenga-ietf-eduroam or
> draft-secretaries-good-practices). 

A lot of WGs and WG work items start life as individual submission I-Ds.
The tracker nowadays tracks their transformation into WG work items.

Nico
-- 






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]