George, Wes <wesley.george@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't believe that smart object networking is viable at any real scale
> without IPv6. There simply aren't enough addresses, even taking into
> account RFC1918. I see this *today* in my own network with deployments
I read the document before the thread replying.
I agree with you, to the point where I didn't think any smart object systems
could operate without IPv6. In other words, I assumed every instance of "IP"
meant "IPv6"
(I also wondered how many IPv6 capable CPE routers pass DCCP/SCTP)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
pgpZYA2phrby4.pgp
Description: PGP signature