The security section is especially handwavey ... especially considering security is probably more important for smart objects while there are fewer resources available for implementing security in smart objects than elsewhere. Here's a useful take on the security issue that might provide some guidance for additional tet in the security section: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ace/trac/wiki/Questions If the IAB is not prepared to undertake recommendations on security at this time, in my opinion security should be tagged as a topic for future work in addition to the pointers to earlier work. - Ralph On Aug 27, 2014, at 2:18 PM 8/27/14, IAB Chair <iab-chair@xxxxxxx> wrote: > This is a call for review of "Architectural Considerations in Smart Object Networking" prior to potential approval as an IAB stream RFC. > > The document is available for inspection here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-smart-object-architecture/ > > The Call for Review will last until 24 September 2014. Please send comments to iab@xxxxxxx. > > On behalf of the IAB, > Russ Housley > IAB Chair >