Re: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 23, 2014, at 12:31 AM, Peter Gutmann <pgut001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> 
>>> so says the man with how many RFCs and other publications to his credit?
>> 
>> that is very ad hominem. I fail to see the relevance of the question.
> 
> It's also somewhat amusing when you consider that it's coming from the person
> who's given us such RFC gems of design as the ones for IPsec and PKIX.  Talk
> about people in glass houses...

We as a community are working to improve communications and encourage newcomers to stay.  Please do not continue to post jabs at others and I don't care of they started it.  It is also a waste of time for everyone who is trying to get real work done and has to read this since they are following a discussion.

Thank you.
> 
> Peter.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> saag mailing list
> saag@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]