Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It's more popular among large providers than small ones.
...

To me, that makes decisions about damage-mitigation work for a
non-essential protocol complicated because one way to eliminate
the damage is to not support the protocol at all, possibly
including stripping its headers whenever they are encountered.

Having talked at length with people at the large providers that use DMARC, I am sure that there is no possibility that it will go away and it is likely that more rather than fewer providers will start publishing restrictive policies.

They understand that it causes problems, and I believe they are open to implementing changes to alleviate those problems.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@xxxxxxxxx, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]