Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)
From: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:28:29 +0900
Archived-at: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3Rg410fUeJc6jBUQXxmGb3QIC8k
Cc: IETF Disgust <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <6.2.5.6.2.20140716161255.0ac7a6f0@elandnews.com>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

> I'll quote from 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg13031.html
> 
>    "Existing deployment of DMARC has demonstrated utility at internet
>     scale"

indeed it has, except in a negative sort of way.

randy

References:
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)
  - From: S Moonesamy
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)
  - From: S Moonesamy

Prev by Date: Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x
Next by Date: Re: Reviving watersprings.org.
Previous by thread: Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x
Next by thread: Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]