Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet.
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:40:57 -0400
Archived-at: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/LlY0T2yFON4ouhObWQJVN8t4uqo
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1404094773482.42250@surrey.ac.uk>

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:19 PM, <l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

So NAPT (32bit IPv4 address + necessary 16-bit send/receive ports) must be 64 bit?

Its 64 bits the same way that paged memory gave you a 32 bit address space on 16 bit chips.

References:
- Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet.
  - From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet.
  - From: Michael Richardson
- RE: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet.
  - From: l.wood

Prev by Date: RE: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet.
Next by Date: third draft list of qualified volunteers for 2014-2015 nomcom
Previous by thread: RE: Time to move beyond the 32 bit Internet.
Next by thread: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-06
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]