--On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 12:57 -0400 Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Toerless: > > You know that the statement of work was sent out twice for > review and comment. > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/4hL91GT5za > 24PTS-LZ1M-ztAA6s > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/o9csPR_gab > YYiXBb-0kMQZvM98c > > These comments would have been much more useful at either of > those times. Russ, (1) Yes (2) I believe that, other than reinforcing prior messages, there is little or nothing in Torless's message that is actually new, i.e., that did not appear in those prior rounds or that was implied by comments that did appear then. (3) It would have been really helpful had the IAOC or IAD chosen to summarize what is different about the request/ SOW this time relative to its predecessors. As an equivalent, a summary by the IAOC of its responses to comments on the prior draft SOWs would have been helpful. Either would have led, I believe, to a much more focused discussion this time around. best, john