Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Tony Finch <dot@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:24:17 -0400
Archived-at: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kMd8_fO9OHBZuDyrJ2ve9f6MgAA
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Stephen Casner <casner@xxxxxxx>, IETF <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1406171510380.3035@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>

On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:12 AM, Tony Finch <dot@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It is a pity that Microsoft's refusal to implement RFC 2646 means that the
> spec is pretty much unusable. Apple Mail used to support it but has
> backed off to formatting each paragraph on one extremely long line.

Yup.

References:
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.
  - From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)
  - From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)
  - From: Miles Fidelman
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)
  - From: ned+ietf
- email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]
  - From: ned+ietf
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]
  - From: Stephen Casner
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]
  - From: Theodore Ts'o
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]
  - From: Ted Lemon
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]
  - From: Tony Finch

Prev by Date: RFP: IMAP Server
Next by Date: Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]
Previous by thread: Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]
Next by thread: Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]