Hello,
I think that John Klensin raised some valid points.
At 08:49 07-06-2014, John C Klensin wrote:
Perhaps it is the best we can do, but, especially since members
of that committee represent themselves once appointed, I think
it would be wise for the IETF to publicly note the issues and
create some distance from this process. That would be
especially important if "we" eventually conclude that we have to
reject its final conclusion/ recommendations.
The "best we can do" will be scrutinized and might highlight IETF
internal issues. The pessimistic outlook is that the process will be
controversial. Should the IETF be entangled in all that? It would
be worthwhile to consider whether the IETF would like to have the
ability to say "we disagree" and how it would be able to exercise
that option when it is actively involved in the process.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy