Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Dick Franks <rwfranks@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
- From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 00:21:14 -0700
- Archived-at: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/lk1SO-ar8Wph3dCImRKk5kX77xw
- Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CAKW6Ri4AJxVjaQJMAOgkO-OfU8KgzauNZz2z+yg=L2RmoNdnbA@mail.g mail.com>
Hi Dick,
RFC 5781 mentions a protocol. There isn't any reference to the
protocol. The RFC is normatively referenced in a Proposed
Standard. According to the document shepherd it "is a mandated to
appear in some protocol [1] messages, and so the normative reference
is appropriate".
This draft is related to cryptography. It is difficult to find
people with the necessary expertise to review drafts about
cryptography. It is even more difficult to get people to do the
review for free.
The reason for this work is get a code point assignment that requires
IETF Consensus. The assignment does not negatively impact
interoperability or otherwise extend IETF protocols in an
inappropriate or damaging manner.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]