On 30/05/14 23:22, S Moonesamy wrote: > Hi Joe, > At 13:42 30-05-2014, Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) wrote: >> [Joe] My concern is that there is not enough information in the draft >> to know what goes into the hash that is the subject of the code point >> assignment. Perhaps it is obvious to someone who implemented the SSH >> code that is not documented in this draft, but it is not obvious to me >> as a reader of the draft. > > That's a fair point. I propose adding the following text in Section 2 > as a warning to the reader: > > The format of the ED25519 public key with SHA-256 fingerprint is > not documented in an authoritative specification. Why? Why not just look at the code and write down what that does in terms of formatting the input. If >1 implementation interoperates it can't be that hard. S. > > Regards, > S. Moonesamy