Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Dave,
At 00:42 15-04-2014, Dave Cridland wrote:
Given the expense and difficulty of IETF participation for smaller organisations and individuals, it's hard for them to club together and stand up to the 8000lb gorillas.

The above is an obvious problem or difficult situation that people do not want to talk about.

Publication in the IETF Stream usually entails giving up change control. Sometimes that does not work out well; see RFC 6109. The process is tedious. It does not have to be like that if people make room for agreement. In simple terms, people can discuss about X for the next three years or there can be a short discussion and a solution within the next three months.

The summary of the DMARC BoF is at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg10138.html According to that message there was agreement for the IETF to take on the DMARC base specification.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]