Re: "Archived-At" headers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sat, 15 Mar 2014, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> On 15/03/2014 03:09, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> > On 2014-3-14, at 14:01, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> If we take the Web as 25 years old, then Internet Explorer 6 is part of
> >> the first half of the Web's existance. You are 13 years and five major
> >> revisions behind and have reasonable alternatives available; you should
> >> not expect constant reminders.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > IE6 is now less than 0.25% of web requests. Adding any sort of support for it is pointless.
>
> Agreed, but on the other hand, using only a simple subset of HTML
> may make a lot of sense for a variety of reasons. However, that
> probably belongs on the IAOC Revamp thread.

I don't care about IE6 per se, but I do care about the heavy
footprint impact of 'fancy' browser based applications. Minimization of
the complexity is an important goal in my opinion.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]