On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 08:22:41PM -0400, Donald Eastlake wrote: > are become ensnarled as one of the actors in a messy controversy. The > authority to take such a rare and drastic action as deleting messages > should be with the IESG, not the Ombudsperson. So, what about "The IESG on the advice of the Ombudsperson"? I also think it needs to be made pretty clear that this is an action reserved for the most egregious cases. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx