RE: Anti-harassment procedures - next version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Note sure I perfectly understood AB's suggestion ("MAY be saved in private data base of the IETF") but as you surely know, creating database records, especially when these relate to individuals, is often subject to regulation in various countries.

-m

De : Adrian Farrel
Envoyé : 07/03/2014 18:36
À : 'Abdussalam Baryun'; 'Pete Resnick'
Cc : 'IETF-Discussion list'
Objet : RE: Anti-harassment procedures - next version

Yes, OK. I think there is a point here that we can work into the next revision. Maybe significant rewording, but by supplying potential text I have been able understand your concern.

Thanks,

Adrian

 

From: Abdussalam Baryun [mailto:abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 07 March 2014 16:15
To: Pete Resnick; Adrian Farrel
Cc: IETF-Discussion list
Subject: Anti-harassment procedures - next version

 

Adding suggestions;

 

Under (5. Remedies):

 

AB/ text suggest/add/

If there is any remaining harassment message or record (which is publicly evidence) after the reported attack and the decision made by IETF, then the related harassment object MUST be removed/destroyed from IETF public access and MAY be saved in private data base of the IETF. 

 

 

Please note that I was requested by the author to post in the IETF my comments. 

 

Regards

AB


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]