Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Nevertheless, procmail doesn't seem like the right answer.

for some of us it is the best answer we have.  there is way too much
real work to do, and the denial of clue attacks are sufficiently
depressing to impinge on one's ability work.

jck once suggested a 2x2 matrix, with clue on one axis and energy on the
other.  the real threat is the clueless and energetic.  thomas seems to
have a primitive and very rough cut at a metric.

He is wrong. Here is why.

Back in 1994 most of us working on Web Security were designing message layer security schemes. S-HTTP designed by EKR and Alan Schiffman was S/MIME in HTTP so was my proposal SHEN.

SSL/1.0 was written by people who had no understanding of security and only a modest understanding of crypto. The errors were so bad that it lasted only about 5 minutes on first public demonstration when it was shot down by Alan Schiffman and myself. And the errors were not subtle or difficult to see either.

In 1993 you did not do security at the transport layer. Everyone knew that non-repudiation was an essential capability and that was only possible at the message layer. Everyone knew that, everyone except Marc Andressen who was so far out of his depth that he didn't know he was wrong.

Only he wasn't wrong, he was right. And he had a valid argument, that implementation complexity was the key concern. And even though his grasp of the theory was weak, Netscape could buy all the expertise it needed. So they had Taher El Gamal and the brothers Weinstein and Paul Kocher do it right.


The same effect was at work in the Web. The reason the Web works and previous attempts to implement Xanadu failed is that the Web has 404 Not Found. Ted Nelson insisted on Referential integrity and since achieving that is a byzantine generals problem, the systems never worked.


It takes a lot to get me to dismiss stuff as stupid and it is usually because it is clever enough to cause real harm. I am on a tear against BitCoin right now because we have already had one confirmed BitCoin suicide and one unconfirmed. And that is only due to the (predictable) collapse of Gox. For many people the collapse of BitCoin is going to cause the collapse of their entire world view. And that is before we start to wonder if the disappearance of presumed-Satoshi a few months back is due to foul play. He is walking around with what purports to be a billion dollars worth of BitCoin after all. 
 

--
Website: http://hallambaker.com

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]