Speak to Dave. Yours Irrespectively, John > -----Original Message----- > From: l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 6:22 PM > To: John E Drake; john-ietf@xxxxxxx > Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: Ad hominems > > > As Dave Crocker wisely advised, there are situations in which it is best to > ignore the correspondent. > > Of course, ignoring the correspondent, rather than the correspondence, would > be an ad-hominem response. Which would be unacceptable. No? > > Lloyd Wood > http://about.me/lloydwood > ________________________________________ > From: ietf [ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John E Drake > [jdrake@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 26 February 2014 01:46 > To: Abdussalam Baryun; John C Klensin > Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: Ad hominems > > AB, > > As Dave Crocker wisely advised, there are situations in which it is best to > ignore the correspondent. > > Yours Irrespectively, > > John >